Privacy Rights And Collective Security At The Airport †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Privacy Rights And Collective Security At The Airport. Answer: Introduction There have been many controversies between the priorities over two very important things and those are collective security and the privacy rights. This controversy can be better seen in the airport security in different cities. The common believed notion is the fact that the privacy rights of a person are more important than the entire collective security. It has been seen multiple times that the terrorists export and import weapons and the smugglers do the same with the prohibited drugs. In this paper, the controversy between these two facts will be discussed properly indeed. It would require much research on the privacy rights and collective security at the airport. Collective security at airport The airports are considered to be very sensible places as millions of people come and go from one city to other. This is the reason the collective security has been tightened in the airports of the big cities. The incident of 9/11 has shown that the terrorists had captured the airplanes and crashed the World Trade Center to dust completely in the year 2001. This is the very reason of tightening the airport security in the big cities. The main purpose of tightening this security is to keep the common people safe.[1] The USA congress had passed the Aviation and Transportation Security Act as they did not want to take any more risks regarding that. They had also set up the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).[2] They had employed the federal employees to take over the charge of the airport security. There are some methods by which the collective security measures are taken in the airports.[3] These are the screening the baggage of the passengers at the time of immigration, x-ray screening on the bags that will be carried on by the passengers, they use the metal detectors for the security of the passengers.[4] Another way of collective security is the Secure Flight Program, which includes the prescreening of the names of the passengers and comparing them with the watch-list provided by the airlines. These things sometimes become to be very much harassing for some of the passengers. Some of them even feel that their privacy rights have been interfered.[5] This is why they raise the prominen t questions about the security checking at the airports. This factor really needs to be highlighted as instances have been found when the security often harasses and embarrasses some dignified people from other countries in the name of security checking.[6] Privacy rights at airports In this section the aspect of the privacy rights would be discussed for the better understanding of the whole scenario. It is an important matter that the checking procedure in various countries have increased globally after the 9/11 attacks and the recent terrorist attacks in the counties like UK, Belgium and France.[7] These include the various security procedures, interviews and screenings at different levels. Many international travelers have always asked about their exact rights of privacy in the airports while going through a security check. Their intention is to know about the ways they can escape the harassment that is being executed at them.[8] It is a very important thing to know that the government officials or the law enforcement officers cannot stop and detain any person just on the basis of their nationality, race or skin color. This is absolutely illegal and punishable offence to be executed on those government officials. The point of views of religion, gender, and ethnicity will also have to be discussed in this case as well. If the travelers feel by any means that they are discriminated by the security checking officials, they can complain to the airport authorities or share their feedback for redress from different government departments.[9] There are several types of body scanning at the airports nowadays like the Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT), Whole Body Imaging (WBI) scanners and the Full-body scanners. The travelers can address the people at the security check point to for other alternative scanning systems if they have any personal issues or physical problems regarding that particular scanning procedure. If a female traveler is searched and scanned by the male security officers, it is obviously not fair and interfering in the rights of those people. So, they can request the pat-down procedure to be conducted by the security officers of the same gender. The travelers can also expect a private screening or scanning during anytime. If the airport authorities do not have that advantage, the travelers have the right to protest against it and ask it to be arranged very soon.[10] When the pat-down process is going on, the passengers can ask for the chairs to sit. The travelers can also disclose to the person about the pain or the injuries he or she had earlier received. This would help the security personnel from touching or pressing that injured part of the body.[11] These things mean that airport security checking is indeed necessary but the privacy rights of the people will also have to be remembered as well. The security personnel cannot just inflict their decisions on the passengers and give the excuse of the laws and regulations of the security checking.[12] The first priority should always be on the privacy rights of the passengers. The collective security checking will obviously be done but the privacy rights of the passengers should not be hampered at any cost. These things will have to be kept in mind since the privacy of any human being should not be interrupted by anyone. Conclusion This paper can be concluded by saying that the privacy rights of the human beings are of the first priority. This should not be compromised with anything. The collective security check in the airports has been increased due to the fear of smuggling rackets and terrorism activities. However, there is always a way for retaining the privacy rights of the human beings. It can only be said that the human beings should be permitted with their privacy rights and this should not be interrupted for the excuse of the airport security check. Bibliography Ashford, Norman, Pierre Coutu, and John Beasley. (2013).Airport operations. Cardwell, Diane. (2014) "At Newark airport, the lights are on, and theyre watching you."New York Times. De Lange, Robert, Ilya Samoilovich, and Bo Van Der Rhee.(2013) "Virtual queuing at airport security lanes."European Journal of Operational Research225, no. 1: 153-165. Elias, Bart. (2012) "Airport Body Scanners: The Role of Advanced Imaging Technology in Airline Passenger Screening." Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. Hall, Rachel. (2015)The transparent traveler: The performance and culture of airport security. Duke University Press, Lum, Cynthia, Peter Zachary Crafton, Rebecca Parsons, Dale Beech, Tarren Smarr, and Michael Connors. (2015) "Discretion and fairness in airport security screening."Security Journal28, no. 4: 352-373.. Mitchener-Nissen, Timothy, Kate Bowers, and Kevin Chetty. (2012) "Public attitudes to airport security: the case of whole body scanners."Security Journal25, no. 3: 229-243. Tirosh, Yofi, and Michael Birnhack. (2013) "Naked in front of the machine: does airport scanning violate privacy."Ohio St. LJ74: 1263.